EVALUATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF OF PELVIC MASSES OF GYNECOLOGICAL ORIGIN BY USG, COLOR DOPPLER AND MRI IN FEMALES OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE GROUP
Abstract
Background: Thepelvicmassesmaypresentatanystageoflife.Whileevaluatingapelvicmass, gynecologistshouldconsideranovarianetiologyasitisresponsiblefor70%ofpelvic massesfoundatexploratorysurgery.Aims & Objectives:TheobjectivesofthestudyweretoquantifytheroleofSonography,ColorDopplerand MRIindeterminingtheimagingcharacteristicsofpelvicmassesofgynecologicaloriginin reproductiveage,andtocorrelatethefindingswithsurgical,medicaland histopathological outcome.Material & methods: Thepresentstudywasconductedon100 non-pregnantfemalepatientsofreproductiveagegroupbetween15-45years withclinically diagnosed pelvic mass.Results: The majority of patients 50(50%)were in the age group of 26-30years,(56%)cases presentedwith pain abdomen.22(22%) withmenorrhagia,8(8%)hadalump, and 5(5%)presented withinfertility. The majorityofthepelvicmasses 63% wereofovarian, 20% uterineand17%weretubalinorigin.Thehemorrhagiccystswerethemostcommonpelvicmass(25%)followedbyfibroids (20%),mucinouscystadenomas(18%),hydrosalpinx(10%),pyosalpinx(5%),ovariantorsion(3%), serouscystadenoma,ectopicpregnancyandmucinouscystadenocarcinoma(2%) anddysgerminoma(1%).Conclusions: Inourstudy,weconcludethatthestructuralanalysisof lesionscanbedoneonUSG.ColorDopplersonography(CDS)actsasanadjuncttoUSG,butaswitnessedinourstudy thereisaconsiderableoverlapbetweenRI,PIandPSVofbenignandmalignantmasses.MRIisanexcellenttechniquefordetectionandcharacterizationofadnexalanduterine masses.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Moore RG, Bast RC, Jr. How do you distinguish a malignant pelvic mass from a benign pelvic mass? Imaging, biomarkers, or none of the above. J ClinOncol.2007; 25:4159-61.
Troiano RN, McCarthy S. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of adnexal masses. Seminars in ultrasound, CT and MRI. 1994;15:38-48.
Schwartz LB, Seifer DB. Diagnostic imaging of adnexal masses – a review. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine.1992; 37:63-71.
. Padubidri VG, Daftary SN. Disorders of the ovary. In: Padubidri VG, Daftary SN Eds. Hawkins and Bourne: Shaw’s textbook of Gynaecology. New Delhi: BI Churchill Livingstone Pvt. Ltd; 1999.310-35.
Goff BA, Mandel LS, Drescher CW, Urban N, Gough S, Schurman KM, et al. Development of an ovarian cancer symptom index: possibilities for earlier detection. Cancer. 2007;109:221–7.
Perera DS, Prabhakar HB. Imaging of the Adnexal Mass. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology. 2015;58 (1):28-46.
Jeong YY, OutwaterEK, Kang HK. Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics. 2000;20:1445-70.
. Alpern MB, Sandler MA, Madrazo BL. Sonographic Features of Paraovarian Cysts and their Complications. Am J Roentgen. 1984;143:157-60.
. Khurana I, Satia MN. Preoperative evaluation of ovarian masses with color Doppler and its correlation with pathological finding. Int J Reprod Contracep Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(7):2084-92.
Wasnik AP, Menias CO, Bhosale PR, Elsayes KM. The Adnexa. In Cross-Sectional Imaging of the Abdomen and Pelvis 2015. New York
Allen BC, Hosseinzadeh K, Qasem SA, Varner A, Leyendecker JR. Practical approach to MRI of female pelvic masses. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202 (6):1366-75.
Andreotti RF, Harvey SM. Sonographic evaluation of acute pelvic pain. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2012;31:1713-8.
Potter AW, Chandrasekhar CA. US and CT Evaluation of Acute Pelvic Pain of Gynecologic Origin in Nonpregnant Premenopausal Patients. Radiographics. 2008;28 (6):1645-59.
. Wasnik AP, Menias CO, Platt JF, Lalchandani UR, Bedi DG, Elsayes KM. Multimodality imaging of ovarian cystic lesions: review with an imaging based algorithmic approach. World J Radiol 2013;5:113–25.
Timor‐Tritsch IE, Lerner JP, Monteagudo A, Murphy KE, Heller DS. Transvaginal sonographic markers of tubal inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12 (1):56-66.
. Valentini AL, Gui B, Miccò M, Mingote MC, De Gaetano AM, Ninivaggi VA et al. Benign and suspicious ovarian masses—MR imaging criteria for characterization: Pictorial review. Journal of Oncology 2012; Volume 2012, Article ID 481806.
. Moyle PL, Kataoka MY, Nakai A, Takahata A, Reinhold C, Sala E. Nonovarian Cystic Lesions of the Pelvis 1. Radiographics. 2010;30 (4):921-38.
Kirsch JD, Scoutt LM. Imaging of ectopic pregnancy. Applied Radiology. 2010;39 (3):10.
. Kataoka ML, Togashi K, Kobayashi H, Inoue T, Fujii S, Konishi J. Evaluation of ectopic pregnancy by magnetic resonance imaging. Human reproduction. 1999;14 (10):2644-50.
Scully RE. Histological classification of ovarian tumors. In Histological Typing of Ovarian Tumours. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1999. 3-9.
. Jung SE, Lee JM, Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung JI, Hahn ST. CT and MR Imaging of Ovarian Tumors with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis. Radiographics. 2002;22 (6):1305-25.
. Fleischer AC. Color Doppler sonography of uterine disorders. Ultrasound Q. 2003;19 (4):179-89.
. Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, Lee SL, Cho SM, Hwang SS et al. CT and MRI of uterine sarcomas and their mimickers. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181 (5):1369-74.
Shah D, Shah S, Parikh J, Bhatt CJ, Vaishnav K, Bala DV. Doppler ultrasound: a good and reliable predictor of ovarian malignancy. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. 2013;63(3):186-9.
. Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Hugol D, Hassen K, Sciot C, Truc JB, et al.Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166 (2):385-93.
Abbas AM. The Predictive Value of Transvaginal Color and Pulsed Doppler in Evaluation of Adnexal Masses. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol 2015;23(1).
Madan R, Narula M K, Chitra R, Bajaj P. Sonomorphological and color Doppler flow imaging evaluation of adnexal masses. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2004;14:365-72.
. Stein SM, Laifer-Narin, RomanLynda Differentiation Of benign and malignant adnexal masses with: Relative value of grayscale, color Doppler, and Spectral Doppler sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:381-6.
Caruso A, Caforio MD ,Testa AC ,Caiampelli M, Benedetti P. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography in the presurgical characterization of adnexal masses Gynecol Oncology. 1996;63:184-91.
. Sandeep J, Jyothi SM. Ultrasonographic Profile of Patients with ovarian tumors. Global Journal For Research Analysis. 2016;4(9):115-6.
. Kochiyil J, Vernekar J. Utility of MRI in uterine and adnexal lesions. International Journal of Medical Research and Review. 2016;4(04): 655-63.
. Guerriero S, Alcazar JL, Coccia ME, Ajossa S, Scarselli G, Boi M, et al.Complex Pelvic Mass as a Target of Evaluation of Vessel Distribution by Color Doppler Sonography for the Diagnosis of Adnexal Malignancies Results of a Multicenter European Study. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:1105-11.
Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H. Susceptibility-weighted MRI of endometrioma: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1366– 70.
Sue W, Sarah SB. Radiological appearances of uterine fibroids. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2009;19:222-31.
. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Garau N, Piras B, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Ultrasonography and color Doppler-based triage for adnexal masses to provide the most appropriate surgical approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:401–6.
Pereira JM, Sirlin CB, Pinto PS, Casola G. CT and MR imaging of extrahepatic fatty masses of the abdomen and pelvis:techniques, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and pitfalls. Radiographics 2005;25:69– 85.
Kim MY, Rha SE, Oh SN, Jung SE, Lee YJ, Kim YS, et al. MR Imaging findings of hydrosalpinx: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 2009;29:495–507.
. Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Sciot C, Bazot M, Guinet C, Prevot S, et al.Epithelial tumors of ovary: CT findings and correlation with US. Radiology. 1994;178:811-8.
. Salem FM, Alarabawy RA, El-Ebiary MT, Edorf AA, Abozeid SM. Imaging modalities in the differentiation of various adnexal lesions. Tanta Medical Journal. 2016;44(2):39-52.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
© Copyright PJR 2008- |