COMPARISON OF ELASTOGRAPHY AND SUPERB-MICROVASCULAR IMAGING (SMI) WITH GREY SCALE ULTRASOUND AND DOPPLER RESPECTIVELY IN BENIGN AND MALIGNANT BREAST LESIONS

Arifa Mobeen, Syed Amir Gilani, Rafia Shahzad, Sajid Shaheen Malik, Mehreen Fatima

Abstract


Abstract: Ultrasound elastography (SW & Strain) is a medical imaging method that maps the elastic properties of soft tissues and provides additional characterization information for recognizing benign and malignant breast tumors over conventional sonography like clinical palpation examination but these mode shows color elasticity maps with quantitative values in real time. Doppler imaging can also help differentiate benign from malignant masses. SMI (superb microvascular imaging), new ultrasound technique for evaluating micro-vessels and is more sensitive in blood flow detection than conventional Doppler.

Objective: To compare elastography and superb-microvascular imaging (SMI) with grey scale ultrasound and Doppler respectively in benign and malignant breast lesions.

Method: A comparative cross sectional study with convenient sampling technique was used. The study was conducted at Diagnostic Radiology Department of Institute of nuclear medicine and oncology Lahore (INMOL Hospital) from July 2016 to March 2017. A sample of 105 women with symptoms and screen detected breast masses prior to surgery, biopsy or fine-needle aspirations were selected.

Results: Comparison of ultrasound elastography, using elasticity score versus B-mode ultrasonography using breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Tumors were considered malignant if they have elasticity score 3 or higher and elasticity values (>70 Kpa) along with the high vascularity detection on SMI. The sensitivity and specificity of BI-RADS with elastography was 98.07% and 85.71% respectively.

Conclusion: Ultrasound elastography is a noninvasive and reliable method to distinguish low-risk lesions and decreasing pointless interventional diagnostic methods. If we combined B-mode ultrasound with strain, SWE and SMI on the lesions, the diagnostic performance would be improved.


Full Text:

PDF

References


References:

Jemal A, Bray F, Centre M M, et al. Global Cancer statistics. Ca Cancer J Clin. 2015; 61: 69-90.

Zahra f, Humayoun F, Yousaf T, Khan NA. Evaluation of risk factors for carcinoma breast in Pakistani women. J Fatima Jinnah Med assoc. 2014; 1: 34-8.

Shaukat U, Ismail M, Mahmood N. Epidemiology, Major risk factor and genetic predisposition for breast cancer in the Pakistani population. Asia pacific journal of cancer prevention. 2016; 14: 10.

American Cancer Society. Detailed Guide: Breast Cancer what are the key Statistics for Cancer? American Cancer Society Cancer Resource. http://www.cancer.org/dcroot/home/index.asp Access May 2015.

Gong X, Wang Y, Xu P. Application of Real‐time Ultrasound Elastography for Differential Diagnosis of Breast Tumors. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2013 Dec 1;32(12):2171-6.

Andreas Adam, Adrian k. Dixon, Jonathan H, Gillard and Cornela M. Grainger & Allison Radiology: A Textbook of Medical Imaging 6th edition. 2015; 978: 4295-9.

Evans A J, Pinder S E, Snead D R J, et al. The detection of ductal carcinoma in situ at mammographic screening enables the diagnosis of Small, Grade 3 invasive tumours. Br J Cancer 2016; 75: 542-4.

Demera A, Evans A J, Conford E J, et al. Diagnosis of axillary nodal metastases by ultrasound guided core biopsy in primary operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2016; 89: 1310-13.

Jung HJ, Hahn SY, Choi HY, Park SH, Park HK. Breast Sonographic Elastography Using an Advanced Breast Tissue‐Specific Imaging Preset. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2012 Feb 1;31(2):273-80.

Olgun DÇ, Korkmazer B, Kılıç F, Dikici AS, Velidedeoğlu M, Aydoğan F, Kantarcı F, Yılmaz MH. Use of shear wave elastography to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2014 May;20(3):239.

Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, Brauer K, Jordan L, Purdie C, McLean D, Baker L, Vinnicombe S, Thompson A. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification. British journal of cancer. 2012 Jul 10;107(2):224.

Ma Y, Li G, Li J, Ren WD. The diagnostic value of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in detecting blood flow signals of breast lesions: a preliminary study comparing SMI to color Doppler flow imaging. Medicine. 2015 Sep;94(36).

American college of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: Mammography. 4th edition. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology 2015.

Chang JM, Won JK, Lee KB, Park IA, Yi A, Moon WK. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2013 Aug;201(2):W347-56.

Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, Brauer K, Jordan L, Purdie C, McLean D, Baker L, Vinnicombe S, Thompson A. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification. British journal of cancer. 2012 Jul 10;107(2):224.

Cho N, Moon WK, Kim HY, Chang JM, Park SH, Lyou CY. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2010 Jan 1;29(1):1-7.

Gong X, Wang Y, Xu P. Application of Real‐time Ultrasound Elastography for Differential Diagnosis of Breast Tumors. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2013 Dec 1;32(12):2171-6.

Olgun DÇ, Korkmazer B, Kılıç F, Dikici AS, Velidedeoğlu M, Aydoğan F, Kantarcı F, Yılmaz MH. Use of shear wave elastography to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2014 May;20(3):239.

Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM, Hesley GK, Sisney GA, Svensson WE, Fine JP, Jiang J, Hangiandreou NJ. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology. 2007 Nov;245(2):401-10.

Thomas A, Degenhardt F, Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Slowinski T, Fischer T. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography. Academic radiology. 2010 May 31;17(5):558-63.

Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, Dwamena BA. Ultrasonographic differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions: a meta-analytic comparison of elasticity and BIRADS scoring. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2012 May 1;133(1):23-35.

Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, Yamakawa M, Matsumura T. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):341-50.

Zhan J, Diao XH, Jin JM, Chen L, Chen Y. Superb microvascular imaging—a new vascular detecting ultrasonographic technique for avascular breast masses: a preliminary study. European journal of radiology. 2016 May 31;85(5):915-21.

Ma Y, Li G, Li J, Ren WD. The diagnostic value of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in detecting blood flow signals of breast lesions: a preliminary study comparing SMI to color Doppler flow imaging. Medicine. 2015 Sep;94(36).

Bartolotta TV, Ienzi R, Cirino A, Genova C, Ienzi F, Pitarresi D, Safina E, Midiri M. Characterisation of indeterminate focal breast lesions on grey-scale ultrasound: role of ultrasound elastography. La radiologia medica. 2011 Oct 1;116(7):1027.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© Copyright PJR 2008-