IMAGING ROAD-MAP FOR CTA CORONARY REPORTING: POST PROCESSING MDCT TECHNIQUES IN DIAGNOSING SEVERITY OF CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
Abstract
Purpose or Learning Objectives:
To learn the approach for easy interpretation of CTA coronary. To describe different post processing CT techniques to assess coronary artery lumen for presence of atherosclerotic disease. To describe vessel analysis tools in grading atherosclerosis, patency of grafts and in-stent disease. To highlight the factors affecting coronary artery appearance on CTA.
Background:
CT coronary angiography can depict atherosclerotic disease burden and has been used as a screening tool in patients with atypical chest pain. Appropriate knowledge of coronary angiography assessment tools on workstation is necessary in interpretation of coronary vasculature. This educational review provides an overview of the post processing MDCT techniques in outlining the atherosclerotic lesion and to differentiate it from cause of false positive cases.
Findings:
CT coronary angiography interpretation requires dedicated cardiac software on workstation. By following step-wise assessment of coronary images using the oblique multiplanar reconstruction, vessel analysis tool etc, disease cannot only by detected but also can be calculated in terms of area stenosis of involved vessel lumen.
Conclusion:
CT coronary angiogram with post processing techniques especially the vessel analysis tools is very useful in grading severity of coronary atherosclerosis.
Keywords:
Coronary atherosclerosis, CT Coronary angiography, Cardiac CT, Chest pain.
References
Zimmerman ME. The direct costs of coronary CT angiography relative to contrast-enhanced thoracic CT: Time-driven activity-based costing. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 2021;15(6):477-83.
Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F, Johnson T, Rist C, Leber A, et al. Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed. Invest Radiol 2006;41:436–42.
Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D. Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. AJR. 2002;179:911–6.
Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:552–7.
Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, Christensen E, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C. 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2007;28(24):3042–50.
Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, Douglas PS. Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA 1998;280(10):913–20.
Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG. Stress echocardiography, stress single-photon-emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Am Heart J 2007;154(3):415–23.
von Ballmoos MW, Haring B, Juillerat P, Alkadhi H. Meta-analysis: diagnostic performance of low-radiation-dose coronary computed tomography angiography. Ann Intern Med 2011;154(6):413–20.
