HEPATIC AND PORTAL VEINS ANATOMICAL VARIANTS: PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS ON ROUTINE ABDOMINAL MDCT

Khalid Mehmood, Faiza Sami, Muniba Jamal, Aqsa Pervaiz, Hira Sher Bahadur, Salman Aziz

Abstract


ABSTRACT:

 

This study reviewed the types, prevalence rate and implications of anatomical variants of the hepatic and portal veins by using routine abdominal multidetactor computed tomography (MDCT). These aberrant increase the risk of catastrophic liver injury and must be diagnosed for intervention radiologists’ and vascular surgeons before complex hepatectomy, living donor transplantation or hepatic venous embolization. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is a prospective study of 7 months from May ‘to November’2017, included 100 patients referred to radiology department. RESULTS: In total, 66 patients out of 100 had at least one abdominal vein variant and anomalies. The hepatic vein variants had high frequency 45% (n=45), while hepatic veins were identified in 41% (n=41). And 20% (n=20) had both variations. Inferior right hepatic IRHV was more common in 46.6% (n=21). The surgically significant mean diameter of hepatic vein was >5mm in 13.3% (n=06). The Variations of the PV system were observed in 41% (n=41) while 59% (n=59) had the normal or classic pattern of the PVs anatomy. The commonest was trifurcation PV (Type 2) in 58.5% followed by right posterior PV as a first branch of main PV (Type 3) in 19.5% (n=08) patients. The branch of segment VII and VI was identifies as a separate branch of RPV in 4.2% (n=02) and 14.6% (n=06) respectively. CONCLUSION: The aberrant portal veins in 66% patients indicate vulnerability to inadvertent complications during surgery and radiological interventions. This emphasizes for diligence CT reporting by radiologists to reduce injury and complications in liver procedures and transplant.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES:

Gorantla, Vasavi Rakesh et al. Anomalous formation of the portal vein: a case report.J. vascbras. 2007, vol.6 , pp.399-401.

Sofocleous CT, Brown KT; Incidence, patterns, and clinical relevance of variant portal vein Rajashree SR et al., Sch. J. App. Med. Sci., 2015; 3(3E):1370-1375 1375 anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2004; 183(4): 1055-1064.

CT, Brown KT; Incidence, patterns, and clinical relevance of variant portal vein Rajashree SR et al., Sch. J. App. Med. Sci., 2015; 3(3E):1370-1375 1375 anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2004; 183(4): 1055-1064

Benninger B; Splenomesenteric vein: formally recognising a clinically relevant section of the portal venous drainage system. Folia Morphologica, 2013; 72(1): 63-66.

Schroeder T, Malago M, Debatin JF,Goyen M, Nadalin S, Ruehm SG. “All‐in‐one” imaging protocols for the evaluation of potential living liver donors: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography. Liver Transpl 2005; 11: 776‐787

Duran C, Aydinli B, Tokat Y, Yuzer Y,Kantarci M, Akgun M, et al. Stereological evaluation of liver volume in living donor liver transplantation using MDCT via the Cavalieri method. Liver Transpl 2007; 13:693‐698.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Adults: Vascular Variants Important in Surgical Planning for Donors and Recipients, Nazli Erbay, Vassilios Raptopoulos, Elizabeth A. Pomfret, Ihab R. Kamel, and Jonathan B. Kruskal American Journal of Roentgenology 2003 181:1, 109-

Cavallari A, Vivarelli M, Bellusci R, Jovine E, Mazziotti A, Rossi C. Treatment of vascular complications following liver transplantation: multidisciplinary approach. Hepatogastroenterology 2001; 48: 179–183.

Atasoy C, Ozurek E (2006) Prevalence and types of main and right portal vein branching variations on MDCT. AJR AMJ Roentgenol, 187: 676-681

Erbay, N., Raptopoulos, V., Pomfret, E.A., Kamel, I.R., Kruskal, J.B. Living donor liver transplantation in adults: vascular variants important in surgical planning for donors and recipients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 181:109–114

Gray H, Lewis WH. Gray’s Anatomy of the Human Body. 20th Ed. New York, NY: Bartleby; 2000

Vine R. Google Scholar. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2006; 94 (1):97-99

Datta AK; Essentials of Human Anatomy. In Thorax and abdomen. 7 th edition, Current Books International, Kolkata, 2006; 244-247

Multidetector-row CT angiography of the aorta and visceral arteries Wintersperger, Bernd J et al. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , 25 - 40

Covey AM, Brody LA, Getrajdman GI, Sofocleous CT, Brown KT; Incidence, patterns, and clinical relevance of variant portal vein Rajashree SR et al., Sch. J. App. Med. Sci., 2015; 3(3E):1370-1375 1375 anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2004; 183(4): 1055-1064

Couinaud C. A “scandal”: segment IV and liver transplantation. J Chir Paris 1993; 130:443–446

Kamel IR, Raptopoulos V, Pomfret EA, et al. Living adult right lobe liver transplantation: imaging before surgery with multidetector multiphase CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:1141–1413

Marcos A, Orloff M, Mieles L, Olzinski AT, Renz JF, Sitzmann JV. Functional venous anatomy for right-lobe grafting and techniques to optimize outflow. Liver Transpl 2001; 7:845–852. liver transplantation. J Chir Paris 1993; 130:443–446

Intrahepatic portal venous variations: prevalence with US. M Atri, P M Bret, and M A Fraser-Hill. Radiology 1992 184:1, 157-158

Prevalence and Types of Main and Right Portal Vein Branching Variations on MDCT.

Çetin Atasoy and Elif Özyürek American Journal of Roentgenology 2006 187:3, 676-681

Chok, Siu-ho. "Management of biliary anastomotic stricture in living-donor liver transplantation." HKU Theses Online (HKUTO) (2015).

Impact of Multidetector CT on Donor Selection and Surgical Planning Before Living Adult Right Lobe Liver Transplantation.Ihab R. Kamel, Jonathan B. Kruskal, Elizabeth A. Pomfret, Mary T. Keogan, Gizele Warmbrand, and Vassilios Raptopoulos.American Journal of Roentgenology 2001 176:1, 193-200


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© Copyright PJR 2008-